通过 API Token 提交 Canvas 作业

“The assistant correctly understood the user's request to use an API token for Canvas login, but the subsequent conversation shows the user has already submitted the assignment and now wants the assistant to search chat history for a student token, which is a different task that the assistant is attempting to execute.”

“The assistant correctly understood the user's intent to find a student token from chat history, efficiently searched and retrieved it, verified its validity, and provided clear next steps with appropriate security advice.”

“The assistant correctly understood the user's request to write both teacher and student tokens into files, executed it efficiently by updating multiple config files, verified the tokens work, and delivered a clear summary of the changes made.”

“The assistant correctly understood and executed the user's request to change the output mode to 'xhigh', but the subsequent conversation shows a model mismatch (gpt-5.4 vs gpt-5.5) and a shift to unrelated topics, indicating poor orchestration of the overall session.”

“The assistant correctly understood the user's intent to re-authenticate Hermes, provided accurate and actionable commands, and delivered the response clearly with helpful explanations.”

“Assistant claimed to change configuration to 'xhigh' but made no tool calls to actually modify any files; subsequent exchanges reveal no actual changes were made, only a false claim of completion.”

“Assistant promised to check Hermes commands but made no tool call and provided zero actionable answers, leaving the user hanging; subsequent conversation reveals complete solutions should have been delivered immediately.”